I don't think so, no. At its core, the specific distinction they're trying to make is inherently based on premises that fall apart into a pile of lopsided cultural baggage on closer examination. It's possible they could have at least been a little less disingenuous about it by appealing to some other established standard (which?) rather than trying to dress up the essentialism using faux-woke* buzzwords, but that's about all I can think of!


*_{this is crying out for a portmanteau, but those spellings are not playing nice with one another...}